Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa Challenges 22nd Amendment as Threat to Judicial Independence

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa has challenged the government's proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, characterizing it as an attempt to establish one-party rule and undermine the judiciary's independence.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa has voiced concerns over the government's proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, alleging that the measure threatens judicial independence and democratic principles. Following Supreme Court proceedings on Tuesday where petitions challenging the amendment were heard, Premadasa stated that the Samagi Jana Balawegaya party was among those seeking to contest the Bill.

Premadasa contended that the government, elected with a mandate to protect democracy, is now pursuing constitutional changes that could jeopardize the judiciary's independence and the administration of justice. He noted that multiple legal and professional organizations have similarly raised concerns about the amendment's potential implications for the judicial system.

According to Premadasa, Sri Lanka's constitutional framework depends on a system of checks and balances among the executive, legislature, and judiciary. He warned that measures weakening any of these branches could compromise the country's democratic structure. Premadasa argued that the proposed amendment should require approval through a national referendum in addition to securing the required parliamentary majority, given its potential effects on the sovereignty of the people.

The opposition leader further criticized the government for prioritizing constitutional changes while other pressing national issues remain unaddressed, including unemployment and industrial challenges. Rather than supporting the proposed 22nd Amendment, Premadasa called on the government to pursue alternative constitutional reforms that would strengthen fundamental rights and enhance public protections. He emphasized that the government's original mandate was to abolish the executive presidency and introduce a new Constitution, not to implement measures that could restrict democratic freedoms.