The Court of Appeal heard arguments today on a petition that seeks to invalidate the parliamentary seat of MP Archchuna Ramanathan, with his legal team requesting the matter be escalated to the Supreme Court.
The Court of Appeal heard proceedings today regarding a petition that challenges the parliamentary eligibility of MP Archchuna Ramanathan. The petition seeks an order to invalidate his seat in parliament, raising questions about his continued entitlement to hold office.
During the hearing, Attorney Senani Dayaratne, representing Ramanathan, made a formal request to refer the petition to the Supreme Court for consideration. The Court of Appeal indicated that a decision on this referral request would be communicated at an appropriate time, without providing a specific timeline.
The case represents part of ongoing legal proceedings questioning Ramanathan's eligibility as a Member of Parliament. No further details regarding the specific grounds of the petition or the substantive arguments presented were disclosed at today's hearing.
About this report
This page covers Court of Appeal considers referral of petition challenging MP Archchuna Ramanathan's parliamentary seat and is filed in the Politics section of KottuRoti. It was first recorded on 31 August 2026. The report brings together 2 source articles. KottuRotipreserves the original reporting language and identifies the outlet behind each account so readers can distinguish source material from the aggregated story.
Follow the source links below to inspect the publisher's original wording, context and later corrections. This page may be refreshed when the underlying story develops or another outlet publishes relevant coverage; its publication and update times help readers identify those changes. For broader context, browse the latest news in this language, the breaking news feed, or the chronological Sri Lanka news archive.
The lead report on this page comes from NewsWire and is presented in English. KottuRoti classifies it under Politics and keeps the source attribution visible rather than presenting aggregated material as independent eyewitness reporting. When more coverage becomes available, the source list and story record can expand while this canonical page remains stable for readers and search engines.
