A five-member Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena will begin hearings tomorrow on petitions challenging the constitutionality of the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution.
The Supreme Court is set to commence proceedings tomorrow on multiple petitions questioning the constitutionality of the Government's proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which was recently tabled in Parliament. A specially constituted five-member bench has been appointed to consider the legal challenges brought by various parties.
Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena will preside over the bench. The four other justices assigned to hear the petitions are Achala Wengappuli, Arjuna Obeyesekera, Sampath Abeykoon, and Gihan Kulatunga.
The hearings represent a significant moment in Sri Lanka's constitutional review process, as the Supreme Court examines whether the proposed amendment meets the country's constitutional requirements. The composition of the bench and the nature of the petitions suggest concerns about the amendment's legitimacy among various political and civil society stakeholders.
About this report
This page covers Supreme Court to Hear Constitutional Challenges to 22nd Amendment and is filed in the Politics section of KottuRoti. It was first recorded on 31 August 2026. The report brings together 2 source articles. KottuRotipreserves the original reporting language and identifies the outlet behind each account so readers can distinguish source material from the aggregated story.
Follow the source links below to inspect the publisher's original wording, context and later corrections. This page may be refreshed when the underlying story develops or another outlet publishes relevant coverage; its publication and update times help readers identify those changes. For broader context, browse the latest news in this language, the breaking news feed, or the chronological Sri Lanka news archive.
The lead report on this page comes from NewsFirst and is presented in English. KottuRoti classifies it under Politics and keeps the source attribution visible rather than presenting aggregated material as independent eyewitness reporting. When more coverage becomes available, the source list and story record can expand while this canonical page remains stable for readers and search engines.