மன்னார் - மாந்தை கிழக்கு பிரதேச சபையின் அமர்வானது நேற்றையதினம்(25.06.2026) சபையின் தவிசாளர் இராசையா நளினி தலைமையில் இடம்பெற்றுள்ளது. இதன்போது உப தவிசாளர் சத்தியமூர்த்தி சத்தியவரதனினால் தவிசாளருக்கு எதிராக பிரேரணை கொண்டு வரப்பட்டு பெரும் விவாதமாக மாறியுள்ளது.நம்பிக்கையில்லா பிரேர…
The session of the Mannar - Manthai East Pradeshiya Sabha was held yesterday (25.06.2026) under the chairmanship of the chairman of the council, Rasaiah Nalini. During this, a motion was brought against the chairman by the deputy chairman, Sathyamoorthy Sathyavarathan, which turned into a big debate. No-confidence motion The members of the Pradeshiya Sabha have said that they are bringing a no-confidence motion against the chairman, alleging that it was wrong to auction the assets of the Pradeshiya Sabha without giving notice to anyone or publishing it in the newspapers, that he was an obstacle to the supply of water when the Northern Province softball match was held in Balinagar, that the chairman did not allow the water to be transported from the Thunukkai Pradeshiya Sabha via an alternative route, that he was wasting fuel for vehicles, etc. During this, the Speaker stated that he opposed the motion and that it was not in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act and that he would reject it. When the Deputy Speaker brought a motion against him in the previous meeting, it was put to a vote. There is a place in the law when it comes against the Deputy Speaker. If there is no place in the law when it comes against the Speaker, how is it fair? He stated that this cannot be accepted and that it should be investigated and that he would take legal action against the Speaker. Following this, there was chaos in the House when strong arguments took place. In addition to denying permission to the media, the Speaker also said that the media is being denied permission to record videos in order to protect the reputation of the House and that the journalists should leave. During the session, members also made various allegations. It has been alleged that water was not provided despite the payment of fees and receipts for the Karumpulliyan Nagathambiran Temple Annadanam, and that this action was taken with the intention of taking revenge on a particular member. Furthermore, some members have insisted that the motion brought by the Deputy Speaker should be discussed in the next session. They have pointed out that while people in all 8 constituencies are appealing to the chairman for a solution to their problems, even basic needs have not been resolved. The chairman of the shop block cannot accept the claim that a shop block is coming up in the Pandiankulam constituency and that Karumpulliyan is developing that shop block for the needs of the people by doing so. This is being built in the Pandiankulam area, and the member of the Karumpulliyan constituency denies this. The members have alleged that the light bulbs have not been installed despite being asked by the member for eight months, and that there are various irregularities in the installation of light bulbs and that they are being re-installed in the areas where they have already been installed. Overall, it is reported that the meeting was held with most of the members making strong criticisms and allegations regarding the chairman's actions throughout the council session.