The US Open will distribute $108 million in prize money this year, the largest in Grand Slam history, following sustained player pressure for improved compensation and working conditions.
The US Open has announced a record $108 million prize fund for 2026, representing a 20% increase from the previous year and marking the largest purse ever offered at a Grand Slam tournament. Single champions will receive $5.5 million each, a 10% increase, while first-round losers will collect $140,000—nearly double the increase seen at other rounds. The prize distribution reflects a shift toward supporting lower-ranked players, with the percentage increases deliberately weighted toward earlier rounds rather than favouring those who advance deeper into the tournament.
The announcement follows months of player activism at multiple Grand Slams. Some players limited media appearances to 15 minutes at the French Open and Wimbledon to protest inadequate compensation and working conditions. The US Tennis Association has allocated $2 million toward a player welfare fund as part of this settlement. However, player representatives originally requested $4 million annually from each Grand Slam, meaning the USTA's contribution falls short of initial demands.
The four Grand Slam tournaments have jointly established a Grand Slam Player Council, addressing another key player request. The council will formally launch after the US Open and provide athletes direct input into sporting matters and prize money discussions at each tournament. Details about the council's framework remain under development, though players have been invited to apply for representation.
While the USTA describes the package as "a significant first step in a multi-year investment in athletes," players have not yet verified whether the prize money allocation meets their demand of 16% of tournament revenue dedicated to prizes, rising to 22% by 2030. The USTA has committed to publishing its financial statement before the main draw begins. Player representatives welcomed the announcements but indicated they intend to continue advocating for improved terms.
